Requesting Information on covered objects

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Sri
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Requesting Information on covered objects

Sri
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Sri
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Requesting Information on covered objects

Sri
This post was updated on .
Hi Erman,

Need your help in understanding the numbers/objects for each edition from below output

SQL> =========================================================================
=                     Covered Objects per Edition
=========================================================================

EDITION_NAME      ACTUAL     STUB      TOTAL
--------------- -------- -------- ----------
ORA$BASE               1        0          1
V_20170104_1115        0        1          1
V_20170105_1144        2        1          3
V_20170904_1329        0        3          3
V_20170905_1612        0        1          1
V_20170920_1550        0        1          1


Below is object list for the same

=========================================================================
=                     Covered Objects
=========================================================================


EDITION_NAME    OWNER           OBJECT_NAME                                                                                                                      OBJECT_TYPE  DROP_ORDER
--------------- --------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ----------
V_20170920_1550 APPS            XXSAR_AP_ROOC_INT_PKG                                                                                                           PACKAGE       6
V_20170905_1612 APPS            XXSAR_AP_ROOC_INT_PKG                                                                                                           PACKAGE       6
V_20170904_1329 APPS            XXSAR_AP_ROOC_INT_PKG                                                                                                           PACKAGE       6
V_20170904_1329 APPS            FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL                                                                                                       VIEW         7
V_20170904_1329 APPS            GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_KFV                                                                                                         VIEW         7
V_20170105_1144 APPS            XXSAR_AP_ROOC_INT_PKG                                                                                                           PACKAGE       6
V_20170105_1144 APPS            FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL                                                                                                       VIEW         7
V_20170105_1144 APPS            GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_KFV                                                                                                         VIEW         7
V_20170104_1115 APPS            FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL                                                                                                       VIEW         7
ORA$BASE        APPS            FND_CONCURRENT_PROGRAMS_VL                                                                                                       VIEW         7


Please help

Thanks,
sri
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Requesting Information on covered objects

ErmanArslansOracleBlog
Administrator
obsolete editioned code objects = covered objects.
A standard cleanup operation removes them..
So, drop_order is probably the order of removing them.
Probably, one after another.. With an order, adop drops them.

This drop_order is an undocumented thing.
But, when I see the output that you sent, I can make an opinion like the following;

Packages are dropped before the views, because a view can be used by a package. (as you see in your output, package drop order is 6, view drop order is 7) So dropping the package first, can be a good thing. So, my opining is that, it is related with the dependency..

As for the actual and stub ->

“actual” - a real object in the current edition
"stub" - the object definition was inherited from a previous edition